The SSP has approached the problem of drugs in a different way from most other parties. Instead of saying Drugs are bad, make them illegal and attack users
we took the approach of saying drugs are bad – how can we reduce drug addiction
. Instead of just condemning the effects of drug addiction we want to tackle them.
At the core of our policies were studies like this one in Switzerland
Some of the studies findings:
- The improvements in physical health which occurred during treatment…also proved to be stable over the course of one and a half years and in some cases continued to increase
- The pregnancies and births which occurred during treatment were adequately supervised…there were no indications of developmental defects in the neonates.
- Illicit heroin and cocaine use rapidly and markedly regressed
- The participants’ housing situation rapidly improved and stabilised (in particular, there were no longer any homeless)
- Fitness for work improved considerably, those with permanent employment more than doubled
- Debts during the treatment period were constantly and substantially reduced.
- Income from illegal and semi-legal activities decreased dramatically: 10% as opposed to 59% originally.
- Both the number of offenders and the number of criminal offences decreased by about 60% during the first six months of treatment
So if you were seriously wanting to tackle the societal as well as individual effects on users of heroin addiction, would you not list all these things as positives, things you would want to happen and be delighted if they happened in addition to reducing the number of users of heroin?
Well a further study was carried out in the UK in the early 90s to similar results, massive improvements in the health of addicts, reduction of usage by addicts, huge drops in opportunistic crime (burglaries, mugging, car theft etc) in the area around the trial. The cost to society in running the trial was far outmatched by the reduction in insurance claims for theft, imprisoning drugs users for possession of small amounts of drugs and so on.

This study is discussed in depth in the book Drugs and the Party Line.
So what was this radical and effective method for tackling the problems caused by heroin addiction?
Controlled availability of heroin on prescription under the supervision of medical professionals.
The SSP looked for what solved the problem and decided that was the best way to achieve it. Essentially we recognised the effects of drug misuse as primarily a medical rather than a criminal problem.
The main SSP drug policies cover heroin (control it) and cannabis (legalise it). The SSY have written extensively on drugs most frequently about the media scare stories about mephedrone. They have written extensively to debunk the media hysteria on the issue.
The War on Drugs
In addition to this we also recognise the war on drugs
as a policy which has failed, is failing and will continue to fail.
In prisons, every visitor can be searched, visits supervised. The prisoners can be searched and have their cells searched constantly. There are guards around the borders of the prison, who can search everywhere and at anytime.
There have been various reports that large numbers of people go into jail with no drug addiction and leave heroin addicts. What chance of controlling drug supply on a country scale?
Time for a sensible, proven to work approach to a serious problem!
You can watch a video of Jim Bollan discussing the devastating effects on a parent of seeing their child go through the current drug treatment system.
Read the whole A-Z of the SSP here