You call this radical?
Posted by alangdundee on 26th May 2009
David Cameron has been all over the press today with his sweeping radical reforms as he likes to call them.
These include:
seriously consider[ing]
the possibility of fixed-term parliaments- reducing the number of MPs by 10%
- Text alerts on progression of Bills.
- More publication of expenses
- possible curbs on the whipping of votes
- backbenchers would get powers to choose the chairmen and members of select committees
These, he claims, will transfer power from the state to the people
. Sounds good, unless you realise this is a man who voted for people to be detained by the state without charge for 28 days.
So lets look at the list:
seriously consider[ing]
the possibility of fixed-term parliaments.
Not only is it a pitiful reform but it is surrounded by two weasily non-commital caveats. Why not fixed numbers of terms for MPs if you want to fix terms? (The SSP voted for 2 terms at our conference a number of years back)
reducing the number of MPs by 10%
In a parliament which is a representative type this makes the body less accountable, not more.
Text alerts on progression of Bills.
Post a reply if you can name one Bill currently going through parliament.
Yep, thought not.
The bills are available here if you wish to see.
More publication of expenses
Long overdue, but whilst MPs make the rules they then defend themselves by not breaking it is toothless and purely populist.
possible curbs on the whipping of votes
How exactly would this be enforceable? Notice again the weasely caveat.
backbenchers would get powers to choose the chairmen and members of select committees
Well hold me back, that is exactly the demand being made by everyone on a daily basis, the problem with parliament being the backbenchers don’t get to choose chairmen of talking shops. Sounds more like throwing a bone to get the support from backbenchers though.
Reforms which were noticeable by their absence included
- Reducing pay of MPs or linking to some measure of wages/income. Might we suggest a maximum of 5 times the state pension? Then there might be some action on pensioner poverty.
- Abolition of the unelected and undemocratic House of Lords
- Abolition of the unelected and undemocratic Privy Council
- Recallability of MPs – by petition of a percentage of constituents or triggered by voting against election promises or by changing their political affiliation
- Proportional Representation – deliberately excluded by Cameron
- Extending the franchise
- Overhauling voter registration to remove the current ease to commit fraud with postal vote registration.
None of these are revolutionary demands. They are basic reforms which are far more radical than anything Cameron has just dreamed up. Of course further reforms would be a real democracy, with the parliament chosen by lot, rather than the oligarchy we have now.
Posted in Accountability, Campaign, Civil Liberties, Election, Equality, Public Services, Scotland, Tories, Westminster, Youth | 1 Comment »

